{"id":916,"date":"2016-07-13T19:27:59","date_gmt":"2016-07-14T02:27:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/bullivant.wpengine.com\/?p=916"},"modified":"2021-02-17T19:29:53","modified_gmt":"2021-02-18T03:29:53","slug":"asbestos-litigation-claim-dismissed-against-building-materials-distributor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/studioactiv8.com\/bullivant\/asbestos-litigation-claim-dismissed-against-building-materials-distributor\/","title":{"rendered":"Bullivant Attorney Obtains Summary Judgment in $10.5 Million Asbestos Litigation Claim against Building Materials Distributor"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"wpb-content-wrapper\">[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Wednesday, July 13, 2016<br \/>\nDRI<\/p>\n<p><em>The Voice<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>Jeanne Loftis<\/strong>\u00a0obtained summary judgment dismissing a $10.5 million asbestos litigation claim targeting their client, a building materials distributor.\u00a0The plaintiff alleged exposure to asbestos from a\u00a0joint compound supplied by the distributor while working as a construction laborer.\u00a0A Multnomah Circuit Court judge concluded that the\u00a0plaintiff failed to meet his burden to establish that the plaintiff was exposed to asbestos from a product distributed by the company, and asbestos from any product distributed by the company would have substantially contributed to the plaintiff&#8217;s asbestos-related injury.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Full Article:<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bullivant.com\/files\/7-13-16%20Loftis%20Tarab.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><u>And the Defense Wins<\/u><\/a><\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Wednesday, July 13, 2016 DRI The Voice Jeanne Loftis\u00a0obtained summary judgment dismissing a $10.5 million asbestos litigation claim targeting their client, a building materials distributor.\u00a0The plaintiff alleged exposure to asbestos from a\u00a0joint compound supplied by the distributor while working as a construction laborer.\u00a0A Multnomah Circuit Court judge concluded that the\u00a0plaintiff failed to meet his burden&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":829,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[197],"post_series":[],"class_list":["post-916","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-news","entry","has-media"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/studioactiv8.com\/bullivant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/916","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/studioactiv8.com\/bullivant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/studioactiv8.com\/bullivant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studioactiv8.com\/bullivant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studioactiv8.com\/bullivant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=916"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/studioactiv8.com\/bullivant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/916\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studioactiv8.com\/bullivant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/829"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/studioactiv8.com\/bullivant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=916"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studioactiv8.com\/bullivant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=916"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studioactiv8.com\/bullivant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=916"},{"taxonomy":"post_series","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studioactiv8.com\/bullivant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post_series?post=916"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}